Chemical, Structural and Morphological Characteristics of Sugarcane Bagasse Fibers Under Different Alkaline Treatment Durations

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Nur Inas Nadira Mohamed Harrith
Zahran Hafiraj
Mageswari Manimaran
Mohd Nurazzi Norizan
Che Ku Abdullah
Anton Kuzmin

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of alkaline treatment duration on the chemical composition, structural characteristics, and morphology of sugarcane bagasse (SCB) fiber, a widely available lignocellulosic byproduct of the sugar industry. SCB fibers were treated with 1.0 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h, with untreated fibers serving as the control. Changes in chemical composition were determined through analysis of extractives, Klason lignin, holocellulose, and cellulose contents, while structural and morphological modifications were characterized using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and optical microscopy. Increasing alkali treatment duration progressively reduced hemicellulose content from 19.39% to 15.09% after 2 h and Klason lignin content from 20.29% to 4.39% after 4 h, indicating effective removal of non-cellulosic constituents. In contrast, cellulose content increased slightly from 44.94% in the untreated fiber to 46.72% after 2 h of treatment. FTIR analysis revealed a marked attenuation of lignin- and hemicellulose-associated absorption bands at 1730, 1600, 1510, 1460, 1245, and 834 cm⁻¹, whereas cellulose-related bands at 1425 and 1030 cm⁻¹ remained largely unchanged. XRD results showed that the crystallinity index (CrI), calculated using the Segal method, increased from 37.78% for untreated SCB to a maximum of 49.80% after 2 h of treatment before decreasing to 45.65% after 4 h, suggesting that excessive alkali exposure may partially disrupt the ordered cellulose structure. Optical microscopy further confirmed progressive surface roughening and fiber defibrillation with increasing treatment duration. Although all measurements were conducted as single determinations and should therefore be interpreted as relative comparisons, the combined results indicate that a 2 h alkaline treatment provides the most favorable balance between non-cellulosic component removal and cellulose crystallinity enhancement. These findings highlight the potential of optimally treated SCB fibers for applications in biocomposites, papermaking, and biodegradable products, although further studies on mechanical, thermal, and end-use performance are required.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biographies

Nur Inas Nadira Mohamed Harrith, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Bioresource Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia

Zahran Hafiraj, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Bioresource Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia

Mageswari Manimaran, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Bioresource Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia

Mohd Nurazzi Norizan, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Bioresource Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia

Che Ku Abdullah, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Bioresource Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia

Anton Kuzmin, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Laboratory of Advanced Composite Materials and Technologies, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 117997 Moscow, Russia

How to Cite
Harrith, N. I. N. M., Hafiraj, Z., Manimaran, M., Norizan, M. N., Abdullah, C. K., & Kuzmin, A. (2026). Chemical, Structural and Morphological Characteristics of Sugarcane Bagasse Fibers Under Different Alkaline Treatment Durations. Journal of Fibers and Polymer Composites, 5(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.55043/jfpc.v5i3.714

References

  1. Maiti S, Islam MR, Uddin MA, Afroj S, Eichhorn SJ, Karim N. Sustainable fiber-reinforced composites: a review. Adv Sustain Syst 2022;6. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202200258
  2. Wong D, Fabito G, Debnath S, Anwar M, Davies IJ. A critical review: recent developments of natural fiber/rubber reinforced polymer composites. Clean Mater. 2024;13:100261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2024.100261
  3. Khoaele KK, Mphahlele IJ, Gbadeyan OJ, Sithole B, Chunilall V. Current approaches on natural fiber reinforcement surface treatment for construction material application. Int J Polym Sci 2024;2024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1387468
  4. Renandito MP, Suryanto H, Aminnudin A, Jatisukamto G, Nusantara F, Osman AF, et al. Modification of sugarcane bagasse fiber: a comparative study of alkali and TEMPO treatments. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res 2025;15:22394-22400. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10517
  5. Nagaraja S, Anand PB, K MK, Ammarullah MI. Synergistic advances in natural fibre composites: a comprehensive review of the eco-friendly bio-composite development, its characterization and diverse applications. RSC Adv 2024;14:17594-17611. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA00149D
  6. Abbas A-GN, Aziz FNAA, Abdan K, Mohd Nasir NA, Norizan MN. Kenaf fibre reinforced cementitious composites. Fibers. 2022;10:3. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib10010003
  7. Devadiga DG, Bhat KS, Mahesha G. Sugarcane bagasse fiber reinforced composites: recent advances and applications. Cogent Eng 2020;7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1823159
  8. Hasan KMF, Hasan KN Al, Ahmed T, György S-T, Pervez MN, Bejó L, et al. Sustainable bamboo fiber reinforced polymeric composites for structural applications: a mini review of recent advances and future prospects. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng. 2023;8:100362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100362
  9. Iqbal RM, Ahammad R, Arifuzzaman M, Islam MS, Islam MM. Manufacturing and properties of jute fiber-reinforced polymer composites - a comprehensive review. Materials (Basel). 2025;18:1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18051016
  10. McKay I, Vargas J, Yang L, Felfel RM. A review of natural fibres and biopolymer composites: progress, limitations, and enhancement strategies. Materials (Basel). 2024;17:4878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194878
  11. Zwawi M. A review on natural fiber bio-composites, surface modifications and applications. Molecules. 2021;26:404. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26020404
  12. Poonam S. Research trends in environmental science. AkiNik Publications; 2021. https://doi.org/10.22271/ed.book.1219
  13. Mahmud MA, Anannya FR. Sugarcane bagasse - a source of cellulosic fiber for diverse applications. Heliyon. 2021;7:e07771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07771
  14. Ndikumana S, Tanane O, Aichi Y, Latifa EF, Goudali L. Innovative applications of sugarcane bagasse in the global sugarcane industry. Processes. 2025;13:3796. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123796
  15. Anggono J, Purwaningsih H, Sugondo S, Henrico S, Sewucipto S, Patel J. Structural evaluation on sugarcane bagasse treated using sodium and calcium hydroxide. E3S Web Conf. 2019;130:01018. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913001018
  16. Tiwari S, Yadav J, Gaur R, Singh R, Verma T, Yadav JS, et al. Multistep structural and chemical evaluation of sugarcane baggase, pretreated with alkali for enhancing the enzymatic saccharification by cellulase and xylanase of the Pseudomonas sp. CVB-10 (MK443365) and Bacillus paramycoides T4 (MN370035) mix-culture system. Front Energy Res 2022;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.726010
  17. Prithiviraj M, Muralikannan R. Investigation of optimal alkali-treated Perotis indica plant fibers on physical, chemical, and morphological properties. J Nat Fibers 2022;19:2730-2743. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1821291
  18. Thandavamoorthy R, Devarajan Y, Thanappan S. Analysis of the characterization of NaOH-treated natural cellulose fibre extracted from banyan aerial roots. Sci Rep. 2023;13:12579. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39229-9
  19. Salih AA, Zulkifli R, Azhari CH. Tensile properties of single cellulosic bamboo fiber (Gigantochloa scortechinii) using response surface methodology. J Nat Fibers 2022;19:359-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1745117
  20. Mani SK, Selvaraj S, Sivanantham G, Arockiasamy FS, Iyyadurai J, Mani M. Advancements in chemical modifications using NaOH to explore the chemical, mechanical and thermal properties of natural fiber polymer composites (NFPC). Int Polym Process 2024;39:406-432. https://doi.org/10.1515/ipp-2024-0002
  21. Wise LE, Murphy M, D'Addieco AA. Chlorite holocellulose, its fractionation and bearing on summative wood analysis and on studies on the hemicelluloses. Pap Trade J 1946;122:35-43. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1570009750125374848
  22. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 1959;29:786-794. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003
  23. Rezende CA, de Lima MA, Maziero P, DeAzevedo ER, Garcia W, Polikarpov I. Chemical and morphological characterization of sugarcane bagasse submitted to a delignification process for enhanced enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnol Biofuels 2011;4:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-4-54
  24. Cao L, Zhu J, Deng B, Zeng F, Wang S, Ma Y, et al. Efficient swelling and mercerization of bagasse fiber by freeze-thaw-assisted alkali treatment. Front Energy Res 2022;10:851543. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.851543
  25. Yadav A, Rani P, Yadav DK, Bhardwaj N, Gupta A, Bishnoi NR. Enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis and delignification of sugarcane bagasse using different concentrations of sodium alkaline pretreatment. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 2024;23:427-434. https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2024.v23i01.037
  26. Nandiyanto ABD, Oktiani R, Ragadhita R. How to read and interpret FTIR spectroscope of organic material. Indones J Sci Technol 2019;4:97. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v4i1.15806
  27. Rao S, Madhushree M, Bhat KS. Characteristics of surface modified sugarcane bagasse cellulose: application of esterification and oxidation reactions. Sci Rep 2024;14:24136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75846-8
  28. Laluce C, Roldan IU, Pecoraro E, Igbojionu LI, Ribeiro CA. Effects of pretreatment applied to sugarcane bagasse on composition and morphology of cellulosic fractions. Biomass Bioenergy 2019;126:231-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.03.002
  29. Zhao X, van der Heide E, Zhang T, Liu D. Delignification of sugarcane bagasse with alkali and peracetic acid and characterization of the pulp. BioResources 2010;5:1565-1580. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.5.3.1565-1580
  30. Gong Y, Chen X, Wu W. Application of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy in sample preparation: material characterization and mechanism investigation. Adv Sample Prep 2024;11:100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sampre.2024.100122
  31. Thite VS, Nerurkar AS. Valorization of sugarcane bagasse by chemical pretreatment and enzyme mediated deconstruction. Sci Rep 2019;9:15904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52347-7
  32. French AD. Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 2014;21:885-896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4
  33. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK. Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 2010;3:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-3-10
  34. Salem KS, Kasera NK, Rahman MA, Jameel H, Habibi Y, Eichhorn SJ, et al. Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination. Chem Soc Rev 2023;52:6417-6446. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CS00569G
  35. Manivel S, Pannirselvam N, Gopinath R, Sathishkumar TP. Influence of alkali treatment on physicochemical, thermal and mechanical properties of Hibiscus vitifolius fibers. J Nat Fibers 2022;19:11708-11721. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.2037489

Most read articles by the same author(s)